Offensive Patent Insurance

Share This

Offensive Patent Insurance

Offensive Patent Insurance, sometimes called “Patent Abatement Insurance” pays legal expenses you incur to pursue someone who is infringing your patent. Patent Abatement Insurance can be useful to small inventors and companies.

As an example, small inventors and companies with patents often need to enlist the help of larger companies in order to exploit the patented technology. This can put inventors in a vulnerable position, because they might not have the money to pursue the big company if the big company decides to cut them out, steal their ideas, and infringe their patents. Rivals who sense that the small company might not have the means to pursue them may also elect to infringe.

In A Hurry And Need A Quote?

Go to our Patent Insurance Quote Page for information on quickly starting the process.

No Coverage For Frivolous Suits

The most important factor in determining if Offensive Patent Insurance is right for you is the nature of the coverage itself. There is no coverage if at the outset of potential legal hostilities, you cannot get an opinion from a lawyer that you are more likely than not to succeed in the litigation. When you think about it, given that this is an offensive policy, that is the only way the policy could be written. Otherwise it would be a license to conduct frivolous litigation, sort of akin to trolling with weak patent assertion claims.

Wouldn’t I Be Able To Get A Contingency Lawyer?

When looking at this, what you need to do is weigh the benefits and costs of Patent Abatement Insurance against the possibility that a Patent Litigation Attorney would take a case on a contingency basis. When doing so you also need to account for that fact that the Patent Litigation Attorney would take 25-40% of any win. A Patent Litigation Attorney is more likely to take a case that has a higher probability of success and less likely to take a case that has a lower probability of success.

Similarly, the Attorney is more likely to take a case that would result in higher damages if it is won, and less likely to take a case where the amount of potential damages is limited. For a Contingency Attorney, a case with a lower probability of success but very high potential damages or settlement might be more attractive. They consider the expected value and they consider the uncertainty/risk.

Both the insurance policy and the Attorney are responsive to the probability of success. But the Attorney is far more sensitive to the size of the case than the insurance policy would be.

To illustrate, take a look at the following hazard matrices:


Patent Holder Hazard Matrix


Offensive Patent Insurance Scenerio


Plaintiff Win Less Likely              Plaintiff Win Likely


Not Covered   

Coverage Very Likely


Not Covered

Coverage Likely*

*Litigation needs to make economic sense.

Also, note that the insurance company may recoup litigation expenditures if your litigation is successful.

Patent Litigation Attorney Scenerio


Plaintiff Win Less Likely                 Plaintiff Win Likely


Might Take The Case

Likely To Take The Case


Won’t Take The Case

Unlikely To Take The Case

Remember that the Attorney will take 25-40% of whatever you win.


In addition to this contractual language, the policies are carefully underwritten.

Offensive Patent Insurance – Advanced Coverage Discussion

The following discussion goes over some of the common provisions in traditional Offensive Patent Insurance Policies. It contains material from my article in New Matter. In this discussion, Company is defined as the insurance company providing the coverage. As always, this discussion is informational in nature, and not professional advice. To determine the actual scope of coverage you must refer to the actual policy contract and endorsements, preferably with your intellectual property attorney’s advice and counsel.

Covered Claims

Stand-alone offensive policies are designed to support the enforcement of claims where the insured is likely to prevail. Offensive policies typically require independent counsel to opine that the insured is more likely than not to prevail. And, once again, there are restrictions as to who can be selected as independent counsel.

These policies tend to only provide coverage for strong cases, such as those where a client would otherwise be able to retain an attorney on a contingency fee basis. So, these policies tend to provide coverage for claims where a thinly capitalized client would still be able to enforce its rights without the policy, albeit at the price of giving up a substantial percentage of any recovered damages. The client should consider this when weighing the benefits of purchasing an offensive (abatement) policy.

Choice of Litigating Counsel

Generally, the insured selects the litigating counsel, but the Company must approve of that counsel. The litigating counsel must abide by a fee agreement and other agreements. Disputes may be handled through mediation.


In the event that litigation is successful, the Company generally may recoup part or all of its expenditures supporting the litigation.

Third Party Retaliatory Claims

Policies can be written to provide some coverage for defenses against retaliatory claims that attempt to invalidate the insured’s IP.

Coinsurance and Retention

Generally, all policies require a small, minimum self-insured retention, which is expressed as a percentage of the coverage limit. For instance, a ten percent coinsurance in this context would require the insured to pay ten dollars for every ninety dollars of loss paid by the insurer.

Get An Offensive Patent Insurance Indication

Alta is focused on this line of business. Contact us today if you are interested in applying for Offensive Patent Insurance. You may visit our Get A Patent Insurance Quote Page for details on how to apply and to obtain application forms.

© 2009-2016 Alta Financial & Insurance Services, LLC